Difference between revisions of "Talk:Combat"

From RogueBasin
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
With all articles removed from the Combat category, that reference is out of date, but without that link, this entry really says nothing. "Combat" is too broad a concept to really deal with except through a category, so my instinct is to delete this page. What do you think? [[User:Rdanhenry|Rdanhenry]] 08:28, 14 June 2009 (CEST)
With all articles removed from the Combat category, that reference is out of date, but without that link, this entry really says nothing. "Combat" is too broad a concept to really deal with except through a category, so my instinct is to delete this page. What do you think? [[User:Rdanhenry|Rdanhenry]] 08:28, 14 June 2009 (CEST)


: Don't forget to check the "What links here" page first. [[User:PaulBlay|PaulBlay]]
: Don't forget to check the "What links here" page first. Really though I don't know why "Combat" isn't a valid subcategory of Articles.  The Articles category is too crowded already, IMO.  [[User:PaulBlay|PaulBlay]]

Revision as of 09:47, 14 June 2009

With all articles removed from the Combat category, that reference is out of date, but without that link, this entry really says nothing. "Combat" is too broad a concept to really deal with except through a category, so my instinct is to delete this page. What do you think? Rdanhenry 08:28, 14 June 2009 (CEST)

Don't forget to check the "What links here" page first. Really though I don't know why "Combat" isn't a valid subcategory of Articles. The Articles category is too crowded already, IMO. PaulBlay