Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tree of roguelike evolution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
My opinion is that the link between [[Rogue]] and the roguelikes on the second line of the tree is more influencial than actual succession. It's there to show Rogue was the first one and [[Moria]], [[Larn]] and such defined gameplay. - [[User:Poulpy|Poulpy]] 17:00, 10 Jul 2005 (CEST) | My opinion is that the link between [[Rogue]] and the roguelikes on the second line of the tree is more influencial than actual succession. It's there to show Rogue was the first one and [[Moria]], [[Larn]] and such defined gameplay. - [[User:Poulpy|Poulpy]] 17:00, 10 Jul 2005 (CEST) | ||
Err, but the Rogue wasn't the first one. If was merely the most popular one (probably because it was included in the BSD distribution). --[[User:TheSheep|The Sheep]] 08:31, 11 Jul 2005 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 06:31, 11 July 2005
Larn
I don't thing that Larn originates from Rogue :/ Of course, it's nice and tidy to have a single predescor, but it's not that simple, I'm afraid. --The Sheep 10:20, 10 Jul 2005 (CEST)
My opinion is that the link between Rogue and the roguelikes on the second line of the tree is more influencial than actual succession. It's there to show Rogue was the first one and Moria, Larn and such defined gameplay. - Poulpy 17:00, 10 Jul 2005 (CEST)
Err, but the Rogue wasn't the first one. If was merely the most popular one (probably because it was included in the BSD distribution). --The Sheep 08:31, 11 Jul 2005 (CEST)